How does perception affect individual decision making? Illustrate with reference to the various alternative decision making models.
Effects of Perception on Individual Decision Making
Individual can perceive differently for the same subject in different manner, which lead to the best solution. Every decision requires interpretation and evaluation of information. Data are typically received from multiple sources and they need to be screened, processed and interpreted. The perceptions of the decision maker will give solution to that question.
Individual decision making is a crucial part of organizational behavior. For instance, top managers determine their organization's goals. Similarly, non- managerial employees have to make a lot of decision during their daily works as per the different situation in hand. It affects the organization's long-term plans, its quality, performance and day-to-day operation. This all show that perception plays a vital role in individual's decision process. It is further illustrated through few decision making models
Alternative Decision Making Model
The main approaches to decision making may be studied in the following three dimensions:
1. Classical approach: This is also known as prescriptive, rational or normative It specifies how decision should be made to achieve the desired outcome. Under this approach, decisions are made rationally and are directed toward a single and stable goal. It is applied in certainty condition in which the decision maker has full information relating to the problem and also knows all the alternative solutions. It is an ideal way in making a decision? It is rational in the sense that it is scientific, systematic and a step-by-step process. This model assumes the manager as a rational economic man who makes decisions to meet the economic interest of the organization, this model is based on the following assumptions:
- The decision maker has a clear, well-defined goal to be achieved.
- All the problems are precisely defined
- All alternative courses of action and their potential consequences are known.
- The decision maker can rank the entire alternatives on the basis of their preferred consequences.
- The decision maker can select the alternative that maximizes outcome.
The classical model is supposed to be idealistic and rational but it is rarely found in practice.4
2. Behavioral approach: This approach is also known as descriptive approach and administrative The theory is proposed by Herbert A Simon, a well-known economist, in which he attempts to explain how decisions are made in real life situations. Managers have limited and simplified view of problems because they do not have full information about the problems, do not possesses knowledge of all possible alternative solutions, do not have the ability to process environmental and technological information and do not have sufficient time and resources to conduct an exhaustive search for alternative solutions to the problems. Therefore, this model is based on two concepts:
- Bounded rationality: Simon believed that managers are bound by limited mental capacity and emotion as well as by environmental factors over which they have no control. Real life challenges, time and resource limitations, political pressure and other internal and external factors force the manager to work under the condition of bounded rationality. Therefore, the manager cannot take a perfectly rational decision.
- Satisfying: It is the selection of a course of action whose consequences are good enough. Bounded rationality forces managers to accept decisions that are only 'good enough', rather than ideal. Such managerial decisions become rational but within the limits of mangers' ability and availability of information. Managers make decisions based on alternatives that are satisfactory. The examples of satisfying decisions are fair price, reasonable profit, adequate market share, proper quality products etc.
3. Implicit favorite model/Retrospective approach: This approach is applicable in non- programmed decisions. In this approach, the manager first chooses an alternative solution to the problem and highlights its strength, and compare with other alternatives and then identifies its This is done with a view to proving that the alternative selected by the best solution to the given problem. However, another alternative which seems to be similar to the implicit favorite is short listed and is taken as second confirmation candidate. This approach can be observed in the purchase of various favorite items in which a customer gives arguments in favor of his choice on the basis of norms such as price, quality, appearance, easily availability, after- sales service etc. to reject other items of same utility.
